#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Internacional U2055010:93.8
2.Corinthians U2055013:33.2
3.Flamengo RJ U205509:52.8
4.Atletico-MG U205506:52.2
5.RB Bragantino U204404:134.3
6.Ceara U204408:73.8
7.Botafogo U204405:73
8.America MG U204407:32.5
9.Fluminense U205416:52.2
10.Cuiaba U204313:31.5
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Santos U2055021:106.2
2.Athletico-PR U205508:83.2
3.Palmeiras U2055010:42.8
4.Sao Paulo U205506:82.8
5.Fortaleza U205504:51.8
6.Cruzeiro U2044014:75.3
7.Bahia U204408:73.8
8.Atletico GO U204403:113.5
9.Gremio U204408:53.3
10.Goias U204313:41.8
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.RB Bragantino U204404:134.3
2.Internacional U2054110:93.8
3.Ceara U204408:73.8
4.Corinthians U2054113:33.2
5.Flamengo RJ U205329:52.8
6.America MG U204317:32.5
7.Fluminense U205326:52.2
8.Botafogo U204225:73
9.Atletico-MG U205236:52.2
10.Cuiaba U204133:31.5
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Santos U2055021:106.2
2.Cruzeiro U2044014:75.3
3.Gremio U204408:53.3
4.Athletico-PR U205418:83.2
5.Bahia U204318:73.8
6.Atletico GO U204313:113.5
7.Palmeiras U2053210:42.8
8.Sao Paulo U205326:82.8
9.Fortaleza U205324:51.8
10.Goias U204223:41.8
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.RB Bragantino U204404:134.3
2.Internacional U2054110:93.8
3.Ceara U204408:73.8
4.Corinthians U2054113:33.2
5.Botafogo U204225:73
6.Flamengo RJ U205239:52.8
7.Fluminense U205236:52.2
8.Atletico-MG U205236:52.2
9.America MG U204137:32.5
10.Cuiaba U204133:31.5
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Santos U2055021:106.2
2.Cruzeiro U2044014:75.3
3.Bahia U204318:73.8
4.Gremio U204318:53.3
5.Athletico-PR U205328:83.2
6.Palmeiras U2053210:42.8
7.Sao Paulo U205326:82.8
8.Atletico GO U204223:113.5
9.Goias U204223:41.8
10.Fortaleza U205144:51.8
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Internacional U2054110:93.8
2.RB Bragantino U204314:134.3
3.Ceara U204228:73.8
4.Corinthians U2052313:33.2
5.Botafogo U204225:73
6.Fluminense U205236:52.2
7.Atletico-MG U205236:52.2
8.Flamengo RJ U205149:52.8
9.America MG U204137:32.5
10.Cuiaba U204133:31.5
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Santos U2055021:106.2
2.Cruzeiro U2043114:75.3
3.Bahia U204228:73.8
4.Athletico-PR U205238:83.2
5.Palmeiras U2052310:42.8
6.Sao Paulo U205236:82.8
7.Atletico GO U204133:113.5
8.Gremio U204138:53.3
9.Goias U204043:41.8
10.Fortaleza U205054:51.8
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Botafogo U204225:73
2.RB Bragantino U204134:134.3
3.Internacional U2051410:93.8
4.Ceara U204138:73.8
5.Corinthians U2051413:33.2
6.Flamengo RJ U205149:52.8
7.America MG U204137:32.5
8.Fluminense U205056:52.2
9.Atletico-MG U205056:52.2
10.Cuiaba U204043:31.5
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Santos U2054121:106.2
2.Cruzeiro U2043114:75.3
3.Bahia U204228:73.8
4.Atletico GO U204133:113.5
5.Gremio U204138:53.3
6.Athletico-PR U205148:83.2
7.Palmeiras U2051410:42.8
8.Sao Paulo U205146:82.8
9.Goias U204043:41.8
10.Fortaleza U205054:51.8
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.RB Bragantino U204134:134.3
2.Internacional U2051410:93.8
3.Flamengo RJ U205149:52.8
4.Ceara U204048:73.8
5.Corinthians U2050513:33.2
6.Botafogo U204045:73
7.America MG U204047:32.5
8.Fluminense U205056:52.2
9.Atletico-MG U205056:52.2
10.Cuiaba U204043:31.5
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Santos U2053221:106.2
2.Cruzeiro U2042214:75.3
3.Bahia U204138:73.8
4.Atletico GO U204133:113.5
5.Athletico-PR U205148:83.2
6.Gremio U204048:53.3
7.Palmeiras U2050510:42.8
8.Sao Paulo U205056:82.8
9.Goias U204043:41.8
10.Fortaleza U205054:51.8
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Flamengo RJ U205149:52.8
2.RB Bragantino U204044:134.3
3.Internacional U2050510:93.8
4.Ceara U204048:73.8
5.Corinthians U2050513:33.2
6.Botafogo U204045:73
7.America MG U204047:32.5
8.Fluminense U205056:52.2
9.Atletico-MG U205056:52.2
10.Cuiaba U204043:31.5
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Santos U2051421:106.2
2.Cruzeiro U2041314:75.3
3.Atletico GO U204133:113.5
4.Bahia U204048:73.8
5.Gremio U204048:53.3
6.Athletico-PR U205058:83.2
7.Palmeiras U2050510:42.8
8.Sao Paulo U205056:82.8
9.Goias U204043:41.8
10.Fortaleza U205054:51.8