#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Palmeiras U205509:63
2.Sao Paulo U205509:52.8
3.Fortaleza U205506:82.8
4.Flamengo RJ U2055012:12.6
5.Ceara U204409:63.8
6.Bahia U204402:123.5
7.America MG U2044010:33.3
8.Botafogo U204405:32
9.Atletico-MG U205415:41.8
10.Cruzeiro U204313:52
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Athletico-PR U2055013:33.2
2.Santos U2055011:43
3.Internacional U205506:72.6
4.Vasco U2044014:65
5.Atletico GO U204404:124
6.Chapecoense-SC U204404:103.5
7.RB Bragantino U204407:53
8.Fluminense U205414:31.4
9.Corinthians U204403:21.3
10.Gremio U205325:41.8
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Palmeiras U205509:63
2.Flamengo RJ U2055012:12.6
3.Ceara U204409:63.8
4.Bahia U204402:123.5
5.America MG U2044010:33.3
6.Sao Paulo U205329:52.8
7.Fortaleza U205326:82.8
8.Cruzeiro U204313:52
9.Atletico-MG U205325:41.8
10.Botafogo U204225:32
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Santos U2055011:43
2.Vasco U2044014:65
3.Atletico GO U204404:124
4.Chapecoense-SC U204404:103.5
5.Athletico-PR U2054113:33.2
6.RB Bragantino U204317:53
7.Internacional U205326:72.6
8.Fluminense U205324:31.4
9.Gremio U205235:41.8
10.Corinthians U204133:21.3
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Bahia U204312:123.5
2.Sao Paulo U205329:52.8
3.Fortaleza U205326:82.8
4.Ceara U204229:63.8
5.America MG U2042210:33.3
6.Palmeiras U205239:63
7.Flamengo RJ U2052312:12.6
8.Atletico-MG U205235:41.8
9.Botafogo U204135:32
10.Cruzeiro U204133:52
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Athletico-PR U2054113:33.2
2.Vasco U2043114:65
3.Atletico GO U204314:124
4.Chapecoense-SC U204314:103.5
5.RB Bragantino U204317:53
6.Santos U2053211:43
7.Internacional U205236:72.6
8.Gremio U205235:41.8
9.Fluminense U205054:31.4
10.Corinthians U204043:21.3
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Ceara U204229:63.8
2.Bahia U204222:123.5
3.America MG U2042210:33.3
4.Palmeiras U205239:63
5.Sao Paulo U205239:52.8
6.Fortaleza U205146:82.8
7.Flamengo RJ U2051412:12.6
8.Botafogo U204135:32
9.Cruzeiro U204133:52
10.Atletico-MG U205055:41.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Vasco U2043114:65
2.Atletico GO U204314:124
3.Chapecoense-SC U204224:103.5
4.Athletico-PR U2052313:33.2
5.Internacional U205236:72.6
6.RB Bragantino U204137:53
7.Santos U2051411:43
8.Gremio U205145:41.8
9.Fluminense U205054:31.4
10.Corinthians U204043:21.3
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Ceara U204139:63.8
2.Bahia U204132:123.5
3.America MG U2041310:33.3
4.Palmeiras U205149:63
5.Sao Paulo U205149:52.8
6.Fortaleza U205146:82.8
7.Flamengo RJ U2050512:12.6
8.Botafogo U204045:32
9.Cruzeiro U204043:52
10.Atletico-MG U205055:41.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Vasco U2043114:65
2.Atletico GO U204134:124
3.Chapecoense-SC U204134:103.5
4.Athletico-PR U2051413:33.2
5.RB Bragantino U204137:53
6.Santos U2051411:43
7.Internacional U205146:72.6
8.Gremio U205145:41.8
9.Fluminense U205054:31.4
10.Corinthians U204043:21.3
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Ceara U204139:63.8
2.Fortaleza U205146:82.8
3.Bahia U204042:123.5
4.America MG U2040410:33.3
5.Palmeiras U205059:63
6.Sao Paulo U205059:52.8
7.Flamengo RJ U2050512:12.6
8.Botafogo U204045:32
9.Cruzeiro U204043:52
10.Atletico-MG U205055:41.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Vasco U2043114:65
2.Atletico GO U204134:124
3.Chapecoense-SC U204044:103.5
4.Athletico-PR U2050513:33.2
5.RB Bragantino U204047:53
6.Santos U2050511:43
7.Internacional U205056:72.6
8.Gremio U205055:41.8
9.Fluminense U205054:31.4
10.Corinthians U204043:21.3
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Ceara U204139:63.8
2.Bahia U204042:123.5
3.America MG U2040410:33.3
4.Palmeiras U205059:63
5.Sao Paulo U205059:52.8
6.Fortaleza U205056:82.8
7.Flamengo RJ U2050512:12.6
8.Botafogo U204045:32
9.Cruzeiro U204043:52
10.Atletico-MG U205055:41.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Vasco U2040414:65
2.Atletico GO U204044:124
3.Chapecoense-SC U204044:103.5
4.Athletico-PR U2050513:33.2
5.RB Bragantino U204047:53
6.Santos U2050511:43
7.Internacional U205056:72.6
8.Gremio U205055:41.8
9.Fluminense U205054:31.4
10.Corinthians U204043:21.3