#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.America MG U2055010:73.4
2.Cruzeiro U205505:52
3.Ceara U205503:72
4.Botafogo U205503:61.8
5.Sao Paulo U204404:103.5
6.Fortaleza U204402:123.5
7.Bahia U205415:113.2
8.Atletico-MG U204405:62.8
9.Palmeiras U2044010:12.8
10.Flamengo RJ U204316:52.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.RB Bragantino U205508:93.4
2.Chapecoense-SC U205503:143.4
3.Atletico GO U205506:103.2
4.Athletico-PR U204408:84
5.Corinthians U2054114:33.4
6.Santos U204404:62.5
7.Gremio U204403:72.5
8.Vasco U205415:31.6
9.Fluminense U204401:51.5
10.Internacional U204314:62.5
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.America MG U2055010:73.4
2.Fortaleza U204402:123.5
3.Bahia U205415:113.2
4.Cruzeiro U205415:52
5.Ceara U205413:72
6.Botafogo U205413:61.8
7.Sao Paulo U204314:103.5
8.Flamengo RJ U204316:52.8
9.Atletico-MG U204315:62.8
10.Palmeiras U2042210:12.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.RB Bragantino U205508:93.4
2.Chapecoense-SC U205503:143.4
3.Atletico GO U205506:103.2
4.Athletico-PR U204318:84
5.Corinthians U2053214:33.4
6.Internacional U204314:62.5
7.Santos U204314:62.5
8.Gremio U204313:72.5
9.Vasco U205235:31.6
10.Fluminense U204131:51.5
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Bahia U205415:113.2
2.Fortaleza U204312:123.5
3.America MG U2053210:73.4
4.Flamengo RJ U204316:52.8
5.Sao Paulo U204224:103.5
6.Atletico-MG U204225:62.8
7.Palmeiras U2042210:12.8
8.Cruzeiro U205145:52
9.Ceara U205143:72
10.Botafogo U205053:61.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Atletico GO U205416:103.2
2.Athletico-PR U204318:84
3.Corinthians U2053214:33.4
4.RB Bragantino U205328:93.4
5.Internacional U204314:62.5
6.Chapecoense-SC U205233:143.4
7.Gremio U204223:72.5
8.Santos U204134:62.5
9.Vasco U205145:31.6
10.Fluminense U204131:51.5
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.America MG U2053210:73.4
2.Sao Paulo U204224:103.5
3.Fortaleza U204222:123.5
4.Bahia U205235:113.2
5.Flamengo RJ U204226:52.8
6.Palmeiras U2042210:12.8
7.Atletico-MG U204135:62.8
8.Cruzeiro U205055:52
9.Ceara U205053:72
10.Botafogo U205053:61.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Athletico-PR U204318:84
2.Corinthians U2053214:33.4
3.RB Bragantino U205238:93.4
4.Chapecoense-SC U205233:143.4
5.Atletico GO U205146:103.2
6.Internacional U204134:62.5
7.Santos U204134:62.5
8.Gremio U204133:72.5
9.Vasco U205145:31.6
10.Fluminense U204041:51.5
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U204134:103.5
2.Fortaleza U204132:123.5
3.America MG U2051410:73.4
4.Bahia U205145:113.2
5.Atletico-MG U204135:62.8
6.Palmeiras U2041310:12.8
7.Flamengo RJ U204046:52.8
8.Cruzeiro U205055:52
9.Ceara U205053:72
10.Botafogo U205053:61.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Corinthians U2053214:33.4
2.Athletico-PR U204228:84
3.Chapecoense-SC U205233:143.4
4.RB Bragantino U205148:93.4
5.Atletico GO U205146:103.2
6.Santos U204134:62.5
7.Internacional U204044:62.5
8.Gremio U204043:72.5
9.Vasco U205055:31.6
10.Fluminense U204041:51.5
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U204134:103.5
2.Bahia U205145:113.2
3.Fortaleza U204042:123.5
4.America MG U2050510:73.4
5.Flamengo RJ U204046:52.8
6.Atletico-MG U204045:62.8
7.Palmeiras U2040410:12.8
8.Cruzeiro U205055:52
9.Ceara U205053:72
10.Botafogo U205053:61.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Athletico-PR U204138:84
2.Corinthians U2051414:33.4
3.RB Bragantino U205148:93.4
4.Chapecoense-SC U205143:143.4
5.Atletico GO U205056:103.2
6.Internacional U204044:62.5
7.Santos U204044:62.5
8.Gremio U204043:72.5
9.Vasco U205055:31.6
10.Fluminense U204041:51.5
#Group AMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U204134:103.5
2.Fortaleza U204042:123.5
3.America MG U2050510:73.4
4.Bahia U205055:113.2
5.Flamengo RJ U204046:52.8
6.Atletico-MG U204045:62.8
7.Palmeiras U2040410:12.8
8.Cruzeiro U205055:52
9.Ceara U205053:72
10.Botafogo U205053:61.8
#Group BMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Athletico-PR U204048:84
2.Corinthians U2050514:33.4
3.RB Bragantino U205058:93.4
4.Chapecoense-SC U205053:143.4
5.Atletico GO U205056:103.2
6.Internacional U204044:62.5
7.Santos U204044:62.5
8.Gremio U204043:72.5
9.Vasco U205055:31.6
10.Fluminense U204041:51.5