#Group AMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Flamengo RJ U20540110:4612
2.Corinthians U2053209:6311
3.Botafogo U2053029:729
4.Fluminense U20522110:828
5.Internacional U20522110:918
6.Atletico-MG U2052127:707
7.America MG U2052039:816
8.Ceara U2051137:10-34
9.Cuiaba U2051045:9-43
10.RB Bragantino U2050237:15-82
#Group BMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Santos U20531116:10610
2.Gremio U2053119:5410
3.Athletico-PR U20531110:8210
4.Palmeiras U20530213:1039
5.Fortaleza U2053025:509
6.Cruzeiro U20522114:1408
7.Goias U2052125:7-27
8.Bahia U20512210:1005
9.Sao Paulo U2051044:7-33
10.Atletico GO U2050053:13-100
#Group AMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Flamengo RJ U20970216:11521
2.Corinthians U20953120:11918
3.Internacional U20935115:12314
4.Botafogo U20941412:11113
5.Atletico-MG U20941411:12-113
6.America MG U20940512:10212
7.Cuiaba U20932410:10011
8.Fluminense U20925213:12111
9.Ceara U20931511:15-410
10.RB Bragantino U20902711:27-162
#Group BMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Palmeiras U20960322:121018
2.Santos U20953127:18918
3.Gremio U20952216:11517
4.Athletico-PR U20952216:13317
5.Bahia U20942314:12214
6.Cruzeiro U20942323:22114
7.Fortaleza U2094057:12-512
8.Goias U2093159:14-510
9.Sao Paulo U20921611:15-47
10.Atletico GO U2090189:25-161