#Group AMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Flamengo RJ U2053208:2611
2.Sao Paulo U2053117:4310
3.Palmeiras U20530211:479
4.America MG U2052218:718
5.Botafogo U2052216:518
6.Atletico-MG U2052215:418
7.Cruzeiro U2051316:516
8.Fortaleza U2051045:9-43
9.Ceara U2050324:8-43
10.Bahia U2050143:15-121
#Group BMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Athletico-PR U20541015:6913
2.Internacional U2052305:329
3.Corinthians U2052216:338
4.RB Bragantino U2052218:718
5.Santos U2052039:726
6.Vasco U20513113:856
7.Fluminense U2051224:6-25
8.Gremio U2051224:8-45
9.Atletico GO U2051134:10-64
10.Chapecoense-SC U2050234:14-102
#Group AMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Flamengo RJ U20962118:61220
2.Palmeiras U20960319:71218
3.America MG U20953120:101018
4.Sao Paulo U20951313:15-216
5.Atletico-MG U20933310:10012
6.Botafogo U2093248:9-111
7.Cruzeiro U2092528:10-211
8.Ceara U20924312:13-110
9.Fortaleza U2091178:20-124
10.Bahia U2090367:23-163
#Group BMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Athletico-PR U20961221:111019
2.Corinthians U20952217:51217
3.Vasco U20944119:91016
4.Internacional U20943210:13-315
5.Santos U20941415:10513
6.RB Bragantino U20933315:14112
7.Gremio U2093338:11-312
8.Fluminense U2092345:8-39
9.Atletico GO U20921610:22-127
10.Chapecoense-SC U2090367:24-173