#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Lugano	52	52	0	156:153	5.9
2.	Rapperswil	52	52	0	161:131	5.6
3.	Bern	52	52	0	133:140	5.3
4.	Ambri-Piotta	52	52	0	128:142	5.2
5.	Servette	52	52	0	145:123	5.2
6.	Ajoie	51	51	0	86:222	6
7.	Lausanne	51	51	0	154:139	5.7
8.	Zug	52	51	1	165:123	5.5
9.	Zurich	52	51	1	163:124	5.5
10.	Biel	51	51	0	149:123	5.3
11.	Davos	51	51	0	145:124	5.3
12.	Langnau Tigers	50	50	0	127:201	6.6
13.	Fribourg	50	50	0	153:120	5.5

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Lugano	52	52	0	156:153	5.9
2.	Rapperswil	52	52	0	161:131	5.6
3.	Ambri-Piotta	52	52	0	128:142	5.2
4.	Servette	52	52	0	145:123	5.2
5.	Ajoie	51	51	0	86:222	6
6.	Zug	52	51	1	165:123	5.5
7.	Bern	52	51	1	133:140	5.3
8.	Davos	51	51	0	145:124	5.3
9.	Langnau Tigers	50	50	0	127:201	6.6
10.	Lausanne	51	50	1	154:139	5.7
11.	Biel	51	50	1	149:123	5.3
12.	Fribourg	50	48	2	153:120	5.5
13.	Zurich	52	48	4	163:124	5.5

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Lugano	52	51	1	156:153	5.9
2.	Langnau Tigers	50	50	0	127:201	6.6
3.	Ajoie	51	48	3	86:222	6
4.	Biel	51	48	3	149:123	5.3
5.	Bern	52	48	4	133:140	5.3
6.	Lausanne	51	47	4	154:139	5.7
7.	Rapperswil	52	47	5	161:131	5.6
8.	Servette	52	47	5	145:123	5.2
9.	Zug	52	46	6	165:123	5.5
10.	Davos	51	46	5	145:124	5.3
11.	Ambri-Piotta	52	46	6	128:142	5.2
12.	Zurich	52	44	8	163:124	5.5
13.	Fribourg	50	42	8	153:120	5.5

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Langnau Tigers	50	48	2	127:201	6.6
2.	Lugano	52	48	4	156:153	5.9
3.	Lausanne	51	45	6	154:139	5.7
4.	Bern	52	44	8	133:140	5.3
5.	Ajoie	51	43	8	86:222	6
6.	Rapperswil	52	43	9	161:131	5.6
7.	Zurich	52	43	9	163:124	5.5
8.	Biel	51	43	8	149:123	5.3
9.	Servette	52	42	10	145:123	5.2
10.	Zug	52	41	11	165:123	5.5
11.	Ambri-Piotta	52	41	11	128:142	5.2
12.	Fribourg	50	40	10	153:120	5.5
13.	Davos	51	39	12	145:124	5.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Langnau Tigers	50	39	11	127:201	6.6
2.	Lugano	52	37	15	156:153	5.9
3.	Lausanne	51	37	14	154:139	5.7
4.	Zurich	52	37	15	163:124	5.5
5.	Ajoie	51	36	15	86:222	6
6.	Rapperswil	52	35	17	161:131	5.6
7.	Zug	52	30	22	165:123	5.5
8.	Fribourg	50	30	20	153:120	5.5
9.	Biel	51	30	21	149:123	5.3
10.	Davos	51	30	21	145:124	5.3
11.	Bern	52	29	23	133:140	5.3
12.	Ambri-Piotta	52	29	23	128:142	5.2
13.	Servette	52	29	23	145:123	5.2

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Zurich	52	28	24	163:124	5.5
2.	Langnau Tigers	50	27	23	127:201	6.6
3.	Ajoie	51	26	25	86:222	6
4.	Rapperswil	52	25	27	161:131	5.6
5.	Zug	52	25	27	165:123	5.5
6.	Fribourg	50	25	25	153:120	5.5
7.	Lausanne	51	24	27	154:139	5.7
8.	Lugano	52	22	30	156:153	5.9
9.	Bern	52	20	32	133:140	5.3
10.	Davos	51	20	31	145:124	5.3
11.	Biel	51	19	32	149:123	5.3
12.	Servette	52	19	33	145:123	5.2
13.	Ambri-Piotta	52	16	36	128:142	5.2

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Langnau Tigers	50	22	28	127:201	6.6
2.	Zug	52	21	31	165:123	5.5
3.	Zurich	52	20	32	163:124	5.5
4.	Ajoie	51	19	32	86:222	6
5.	Lausanne	51	18	33	154:139	5.7
6.	Rapperswil	52	18	34	161:131	5.6
7.	Fribourg	50	18	32	153:120	5.5
8.	Lugano	52	17	35	156:153	5.9
9.	Davos	51	16	35	145:124	5.3
10.	Bern	52	14	38	133:140	5.3
11.	Ambri-Piotta	52	13	39	128:142	5.2
12.	Biel	51	12	39	149:123	5.3
13.	Servette	52	8	44	145:123	5.2

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Langnau Tigers	50	16	34	127:201	6.6
2.	Fribourg	50	14	36	153:120	5.5
3.	Ajoie	51	13	38	86:222	6
4.	Lugano	52	12	40	156:153	5.9
5.	Zug	52	12	40	165:123	5.5
6.	Rapperswil	52	10	42	161:131	5.6
7.	Davos	51	9	42	145:124	5.3
8.	Lausanne	51	8	43	154:139	5.7
9.	Biel	51	8	43	149:123	5.3
10.	Ambri-Piotta	52	8	44	128:142	5.2
11.	Zurich	52	7	45	163:124	5.5
12.	Servette	52	7	45	145:123	5.2
13.	Bern	52	6	46	133:140	5.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Langnau Tigers	50	12	38	127:201	6.6
2.	Ajoie	51	12	39	86:222	6
3.	Lugano	52	7	45	156:153	5.9
4.	Lausanne	51	6	45	154:139	5.7
5.	Rapperswil	52	6	46	161:131	5.6
6.	Zug	52	6	46	165:123	5.5
7.	Fribourg	50	6	44	153:120	5.5
8.	Davos	51	5	46	145:124	5.3
9.	Biel	51	4	47	149:123	5.3
10.	Bern	52	4	48	133:140	5.3
11.	Ambri-Piotta	52	4	48	128:142	5.2
12.	Zurich	52	3	49	163:124	5.5
13.	Servette	52	3	49	145:123	5.2