#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Zug	52	52	0	190:122	6
2.	Zurich	52	52	0	164:137	5.8
3.	Langnau Tigers	52	52	0	105:192	5.7
4.	Lugano	52	52	0	151:135	5.5
5.	Davos	51	51	0	169:173	6.7
6.	Fribourg	51	51	0	155:147	5.9
7.	Lausanne	51	51	0	152:119	5.3
8.	Ambri-Piotta	51	51	0	104:150	5
9.	Rapperswil	50	50	0	138:175	6.3
10.	Servette	50	50	0	160:125	5.7
11.	Bern	48	48	0	126:151	5.8
12.	Biel	48	48	0	143:131	5.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Zug	52	52	0	190:122	6
2.	Zurich	52	52	0	164:137	5.8
3.	Davos	51	51	0	169:173	6.7
4.	Fribourg	51	51	0	155:147	5.9
5.	Lugano	52	51	1	151:135	5.5
6.	Ambri-Piotta	51	51	0	104:150	5
7.	Langnau Tigers	52	50	2	105:192	5.7
8.	Lausanne	51	50	1	152:119	5.3
9.	Servette	50	49	1	160:125	5.7
10.	Bern	48	48	0	126:151	5.8
11.	Biel	48	48	0	143:131	5.7
12.	Rapperswil	50	47	3	138:175	6.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Davos	51	50	1	169:173	6.7
2.	Fribourg	51	50	1	155:147	5.9
3.	Langnau Tigers	52	48	4	105:192	5.7
4.	Lugano	52	48	4	151:135	5.5
5.	Zug	52	47	5	190:122	6
6.	Zurich	52	47	5	164:137	5.8
7.	Servette	50	46	4	160:125	5.7
8.	Biel	48	46	2	143:131	5.7
9.	Lausanne	51	45	6	152:119	5.3
10.	Rapperswil	50	44	6	138:175	6.3
11.	Bern	48	44	4	126:151	5.8
12.	Ambri-Piotta	51	43	8	104:150	5

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Davos	51	46	5	169:173	6.7
2.	Langnau Tigers	52	44	8	105:192	5.7
3.	Fribourg	51	43	8	155:147	5.9
4.	Biel	48	43	5	143:131	5.7
5.	Lugano	52	43	9	151:135	5.5
6.	Rapperswil	50	42	8	138:175	6.3
7.	Zug	52	42	10	190:122	6
8.	Zurich	52	42	10	164:137	5.8
9.	Servette	50	42	8	160:125	5.7
10.	Ambri-Piotta	51	40	11	104:150	5
11.	Lausanne	51	39	12	152:119	5.3
12.	Bern	48	36	12	126:151	5.8

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Davos	51	39	12	169:173	6.7
2.	Fribourg	51	37	14	155:147	5.9
3.	Servette	50	37	13	160:125	5.7
4.	Rapperswil	50	36	14	138:175	6.3
5.	Zurich	52	35	17	164:137	5.8
6.	Zug	52	34	18	190:122	6
7.	Bern	48	34	14	126:151	5.8
8.	Langnau Tigers	52	34	18	105:192	5.7
9.	Lausanne	51	33	18	152:119	5.3
10.	Biel	48	32	16	143:131	5.7
11.	Lugano	52	32	20	151:135	5.5
12.	Ambri-Piotta	51	27	24	104:150	5

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Davos	51	34	17	169:173	6.7
2.	Rapperswil	50	30	20	138:175	6.3
3.	Zurich	52	30	22	164:137	5.8
4.	Zug	52	28	24	190:122	6
5.	Langnau Tigers	52	28	24	105:192	5.7
6.	Bern	48	27	21	126:151	5.8
7.	Servette	50	27	23	160:125	5.7
8.	Lugano	52	26	26	151:135	5.5
9.	Biel	48	23	25	143:131	5.7
10.	Lausanne	51	23	28	152:119	5.3
11.	Fribourg	51	22	29	155:147	5.9
12.	Ambri-Piotta	51	18	33	104:150	5

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Davos	51	25	26	169:173	6.7
2.	Rapperswil	50	22	28	138:175	6.3
3.	Zug	52	19	33	190:122	6
4.	Bern	48	19	29	126:151	5.8
5.	Zurich	52	19	33	164:137	5.8
6.	Langnau Tigers	52	17	35	105:192	5.7
7.	Fribourg	51	16	35	155:147	5.9
8.	Servette	50	16	34	160:125	5.7
9.	Biel	48	15	33	143:131	5.7
10.	Lugano	52	14	38	151:135	5.5
11.	Lausanne	51	14	37	152:119	5.3
12.	Ambri-Piotta	51	10	41	104:150	5

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Davos	51	17	34	169:173	6.7
2.	Rapperswil	50	17	33	138:175	6.3
3.	Zug	52	17	35	190:122	6
4.	Zurich	52	13	39	164:137	5.8
5.	Biel	48	12	36	143:131	5.7
6.	Bern	48	11	37	126:151	5.8
7.	Langnau Tigers	52	11	41	105:192	5.7
8.	Fribourg	51	10	41	155:147	5.9
9.	Servette	50	9	41	160:125	5.7
10.	Lugano	52	9	43	151:135	5.5
11.	Lausanne	51	8	43	152:119	5.3
12.	Ambri-Piotta	51	8	43	104:150	5

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Davos	51	11	40	169:173	6.7
2.	Zug	52	10	42	190:122	6
3.	Rapperswil	50	9	41	138:175	6.3
4.	Fribourg	51	7	44	155:147	5.9
5.	Zurich	52	7	45	164:137	5.8
6.	Bern	48	6	42	126:151	5.8
7.	Langnau Tigers	52	6	46	105:192	5.7
8.	Lugano	52	6	46	151:135	5.5
9.	Servette	50	5	45	160:125	5.7
10.	Biel	48	4	44	143:131	5.7
11.	Ambri-Piotta	51	4	47	104:150	5
12.	Lausanne	51	3	48	152:119	5.3