Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Monclova	5	3	2	41:27	0.600
2.	Dos Laredos	5	3	2	18:15	0.600
3.	Toros de Tijuana	5	3	2	23:20	0.600
4.	Saltillo	5	3	2	29:29	0.600
5.	Durango	5	2	3	29:32	0.400
6.	Laguna	5	2	3	25:31	0.400
7.	Monterrey	5	1	4	18:26	0.200
8.	Aguascalientes	5	1	4	21:30	0.200
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Mexico	5	5	0	43:23	1.000
2.	Oaxaca	5	3	2	34:25	0.600
3.	Yucatan	5	3	2	27:19	0.600
4.	Puebla	5	3	2	24:26	0.600
5.	Quintana Roo	5	2	3	17:22	0.400
6.	Bravos de Leon	5	2	3	20:25	0.400
7.	Tabasco	5	1	4	10:13	0.200
8.	Campeche	5	1	4	10:26	0.200

Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Monclova	10	6	4	75:38	0.600
2.	Monterrey	10	6	4	59:49	0.600
3.	Toros de Tijuana	10	6	4	49:40	0.600
4.	Dos Laredos	10	6	4	40:38	0.600
5.	Durango	10	4	6	68:85	0.400
6.	Saltillo	10	4	6	49:68	0.400
7.	Aguascalientes	10	3	7	43:62	0.300
8.	Laguna	10	3	7	51:71	0.300
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Mexico	10	8	2	70:51	0.800
2.	Oaxaca	10	6	4	65:52	0.600
3.	Yucatan	10	6	4	44:39	0.600
4.	Puebla	10	6	4	49:47	0.600
5.	Quintana Roo	10	3	7	36:51	0.300
6.	Campeche	10	3	7	22:42	0.300
7.	Bravos de Leon	10	3	7	39:79	0.300
8.	Tabasco	10	1	9	22:44	0.100

Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Monclova	15	11	4	111:49	0.733
2.	Monterrey	15	9	6	103:73	0.600
3.	Dos Laredos	15	9	6	71:53	0.600
4.	Toros de Tijuana	15	8	7	72:64	0.533
5.	Saltillo	15	6	9	77:91	0.400
6.	Aguascalientes	15	6	9	82:97	0.400
7.	Durango	15	6	9	97:129	0.400
8.	Laguna	15	4	11	63:101	0.267
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Mexico	15	13	2	121:69	0.867
2.	Puebla	15	9	6	89:70	0.600
3.	Yucatan	15	9	6	75:63	0.600
4.	Quintana Roo	15	7	8	79:76	0.467
5.	Oaxaca	15	7	8	81:86	0.467
6.	Campeche	15	6	9	49:70	0.400
7.	Bravos de Leon	15	6	9	72:104	0.400
8.	Tabasco	15	4	11	42:67	0.267

Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Monclova	20	13	7	134:79	0.650
2.	Dos Laredos	20	13	7	106:64	0.650
3.	Toros de Tijuana	20	12	8	100:82	0.600
4.	Monterrey	20	11	9	116:101	0.550
5.	Aguascalientes	20	10	10	117:123	0.500
6.	Saltillo	20	9	11	107:112	0.450
7.	Durango	20	8	12	134:172	0.400
8.	Laguna	20	6	14	92:130	0.300
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Mexico	20	15	5	148:94	0.750
2.	Puebla	20	13	7	149:102	0.650
3.	Yucatan	20	11	9	90:91	0.550
4.	Oaxaca	20	10	10	112:114	0.500
5.	Bravos de Leon	20	10	10	100:123	0.500
6.	Quintana Roo	20	8	12	98:100	0.400
7.	Campeche	20	7	13	63:92	0.350
8.	Tabasco	20	5	15	51:85	0.250

Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Monclova	25	18	7	173:96	0.720
2.	Dos Laredos	25	17	8	126:83	0.680
3.	Toros de Tijuana	25	16	9	138:100	0.640
4.	Monterrey	25	15	10	149:119	0.600
5.	Aguascalientes	25	13	12	153:151	0.520
6.	Saltillo	25	11	14	128:150	0.440
7.	Durango	25	11	14	178:213	0.440
8.	Laguna	25	6	19	109:165	0.240
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Puebla	25	17	8	182:129	0.680
2.	Mexico	25	17	8	174:123	0.680
3.	Bravos de Leon	25	15	10	142:149	0.600
4.	Yucatan	25	14	11	110:104	0.560
5.	Oaxaca	25	13	12	151:142	0.520
6.	Quintana Roo	25	10	15	128:126	0.400
7.	Campeche	25	10	15	102:132	0.400
8.	Tabasco	25	7	18	70:102	0.280

Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Monclova	30	22	8	216:113	0.733
2.	Toros de Tijuana	27	18	9	148:104	0.667
3.	Dos Laredos	27	18	9	132:90	0.667
4.	Monterrey	30	18	12	170:134	0.600
5.	Aguascalientes	26	14	12	162:159	0.538
6.	Saltillo	29	13	16	161:188	0.448
7.	Durango	27	12	15	186:222	0.444
8.	Laguna	27	7	20	116:176	0.259
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Mexico	26	18	8	180:124	0.692
2.	Puebla	27	18	9	197:140	0.667
3.	Bravos de Leon	28	16	12	157:160	0.571
4.	Oaxaca	30	17	13	169:157	0.567
5.	Yucatan	26	14	12	112:108	0.538
6.	Campeche	30	13	17	128:161	0.433
7.	Quintana Roo	30	10	20	143:180	0.333
8.	Tabasco	26	7	19	72:110	0.269