Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Monterrey	5	4	1	20:13	0.800
2.	Dos Laredos	5	3	2	24:9	0.600
3.	Laguna	5	3	2	46:33	0.600
4.	Saltillo	5	3	2	21:12	0.600
5.	Jalisco	5	3	2	26:37	0.600
6.	Monclova	5	2	3	18:17	0.400
7.	Aguascalientes	5	2	3	25:29	0.400
8.	Chihuahua	5	2	3	16:25	0.400
9.	Toros de Tijuana	5	2	3	14:30	0.400
10.	Caliente de Durango	5	1	4	14:19	0.200
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Mexico	5	5	0	38:19	1.000
2.	Tabasco	5	4	1	36:16	0.800
3.	Yucatan	5	3	2	27:13	0.600
4.	Puebla	5	3	2	43:32	0.600
5.	Veracruz	5	3	2	16:19	0.600
6.	Quintana Roo	5	2	3	20:16	0.400
7.	Bravos de Leon	5	2	3	32:45	0.400
8.	Oaxaca	5	1	4	25:42	0.200
9.	Campeche	5	1	4	12:29	0.200
10.	Queretaro	5	1	4	31:49	0.200

Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Dos Laredos	10	6	4	73:39	0.600
2.	Saltillo	10	6	4	52:40	0.600
3.	Laguna	10	6	4	67:56	0.600
4.	Monterrey	10	6	4	51:42	0.600
5.	Caliente de Durango	10	5	5	50:55	0.500
6.	Toros de Tijuana	10	5	5	37:47	0.500
7.	Monclova	10	4	6	36:38	0.400
8.	Aguascalientes	10	4	6	69:74	0.400
9.	Jalisco	10	4	6	54:72	0.400
10.	Chihuahua	10	4	6	49:75	0.400
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Mexico	10	7	3	63:38	0.700
2.	Puebla	10	7	3	65:44	0.700
3.	Veracruz	10	7	3	38:39	0.700
4.	Yucatan	10	6	4	64:34	0.600
5.	Bravos de Leon	10	6	4	79:77	0.600
6.	Tabasco	10	5	5	56:46	0.500
7.	Oaxaca	10	4	6	51:58	0.400
8.	Queretaro	10	4	6	60:96	0.400
9.	Quintana Roo	10	2	8	28:35	0.200
10.	Campeche	10	2	8	44:81	0.200

Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Dos Laredos	15	9	6	99:61	0.600
2.	Saltillo	15	9	6	81:56	0.600
3.	Toros de Tijuana	15	9	6	76:71	0.600
4.	Monterrey	15	9	6	74:71	0.600
5.	Laguna	15	8	7	89:78	0.533
6.	Monclova	15	7	8	79:60	0.467
7.	Jalisco	15	7	8	87:105	0.467
8.	Chihuahua	15	6	9	67:98	0.400
9.	Caliente de Durango	15	6	9	70:101	0.400
10.	Aguascalientes	15	5	10	87:108	0.333
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Puebla	15	12	3	98:60	0.800
2.	Mexico	15	11	4	85:48	0.733
3.	Yucatan	15	9	6	85:57	0.600
4.	Tabasco	15	8	7	94:66	0.533
5.	Bravos de Leon	15	8	7	101:101	0.533
6.	Veracruz	15	8	7	60:76	0.533
7.	Queretaro	15	7	8	99:126	0.467
8.	Oaxaca	15	5	10	75:106	0.333
9.	Quintana Roo	15	4	11	49:55	0.267
10.	Campeche	15	3	12	56:107	0.200

Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Monterrey	20	14	6	127:88	0.700
2.	Toros de Tijuana	20	13	7	108:91	0.650
3.	Dos Laredos	20	11	9	138:95	0.550
4.	Monclova	20	10	10	107:87	0.500
5.	Saltillo	20	10	10	103:97	0.500
6.	Caliente de Durango	20	10	10	105:124	0.500
7.	Laguna	20	9	11	111:110	0.450
8.	Chihuahua	20	8	12	92:136	0.400
9.	Jalisco	20	8	12	115:159	0.400
10.	Aguascalientes	20	7	13	116:135	0.350
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Mexico	20	15	5	128:75	0.750
2.	Yucatan	20	14	6	116:64	0.700
3.	Puebla	20	14	6	122:80	0.700
4.	Veracruz	20	12	8	89:100	0.600
5.	Tabasco	20	10	10	106:81	0.500
6.	Bravos de Leon	20	10	10	130:129	0.500
7.	Queretaro	20	9	11	130:170	0.450
8.	Oaxaca	20	8	12	131:138	0.400
9.	Quintana Roo	20	4	16	72:111	0.200
10.	Campeche	20	4	16	71:147	0.200

Conference
#	North Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Monterrey	23	16	7	149:107	0.696
2.	Dos Laredos	23	14	9	164:108	0.609
3.	Toros de Tijuana	23	14	9	127:113	0.609
4.	Laguna	23	12	11	130:120	0.522
5.	Saltillo	23	12	11	120:113	0.522
6.	Caliente de Durango	23	11	12	121:141	0.478
7.	Monclova	23	10	13	120:113	0.435
8.	Aguascalientes	23	9	14	140:160	0.391
9.	Jalisco	23	9	14	140:183	0.391
10.	Chihuahua	23	8	15	102:155	0.348
#	South Conference	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Mexico	23	18	5	148:89	0.783
2.	Yucatan	23	16	7	132:76	0.696
3.	Puebla	23	14	9	136:100	0.609
4.	Veracruz	23	13	10	106:122	0.565
5.	Tabasco	23	11	12	108:88	0.478
6.	Bravos de Leon	23	11	12	142:145	0.478
7.	Oaxaca	23	10	13	153:155	0.435
8.	Queretaro	23	10	13	139:176	0.435
9.	Quintana Roo	23	6	17	78:120	0.261
10.	Campeche	23	6	17	78:149	0.261