#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Ambri-Piotta	50	50	0	131:163	5.9
2.	Lugano	50	50	0	156:128	5.7
3.	Davos	50	50	0	131:150	5.6
4.	Servette	50	50	0	124:146	5.4
5.	Zug	50	50	0	143:120	5.3
6.	EHC Kloten	50	50	0	114:149	5.3
7.	Bern	50	50	0	159:107	5.3
8.	Zurich	50	50	0	138:127	5.3
9.	Fribourg	50	50	0	128:132	5.2
10.	Biel	50	50	0	145:117	5.2
11.	Lausanne	50	49	1	145:159	6.1
12.	Langnau Tigers	50	49	1	114:130	4.9

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Biel	50	50	0	145:117	5.2
2.	Lugano	50	49	1	156:128	5.7
3.	Davos	50	49	1	131:150	5.6
4.	Servette	50	49	1	124:146	5.4
5.	EHC Kloten	50	49	1	114:149	5.3
6.	Bern	50	49	1	159:107	5.3
7.	Zurich	50	49	1	138:127	5.3
8.	Fribourg	50	49	1	128:132	5.2
9.	Ambri-Piotta	50	48	2	131:163	5.9
10.	Zug	50	48	2	143:120	5.3
11.	Lausanne	50	47	3	145:159	6.1
12.	Langnau Tigers	50	46	4	114:130	4.9

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Servette	50	48	2	124:146	5.4
2.	Zurich	50	47	3	138:127	5.3
3.	Lugano	50	46	4	156:128	5.7
4.	Biel	50	46	4	145:117	5.2
5.	Lausanne	50	45	5	145:159	6.1
6.	Ambri-Piotta	50	45	5	131:163	5.9
7.	Davos	50	45	5	131:150	5.6
8.	EHC Kloten	50	45	5	114:149	5.3
9.	Zug	50	43	7	143:120	5.3
10.	Fribourg	50	43	7	128:132	5.2
11.	Langnau Tigers	50	43	7	114:130	4.9
12.	Bern	50	42	8	159:107	5.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Lugano	50	45	5	156:128	5.7
2.	Lausanne	50	43	7	145:159	6.1
3.	Zurich	50	42	8	138:127	5.3
4.	Ambri-Piotta	50	41	9	131:163	5.9
5.	Servette	50	41	9	124:146	5.4
6.	Biel	50	40	10	145:117	5.2
7.	Davos	50	39	11	131:150	5.6
8.	Langnau Tigers	50	38	12	114:130	4.9
9.	Zug	50	37	13	143:120	5.3
10.	EHC Kloten	50	37	13	114:149	5.3
11.	Bern	50	37	13	159:107	5.3
12.	Fribourg	50	36	14	128:132	5.2

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Lugano	50	36	14	156:128	5.7
2.	Davos	50	36	14	131:150	5.6
3.	Lausanne	50	35	15	145:159	6.1
4.	Ambri-Piotta	50	34	16	131:163	5.9
5.	Biel	50	33	17	145:117	5.2
6.	Zug	50	32	18	143:120	5.3
7.	Zurich	50	32	18	138:127	5.3
8.	Servette	50	30	20	124:146	5.4
9.	Bern	50	30	20	159:107	5.3
10.	Fribourg	50	30	20	128:132	5.2
11.	EHC Kloten	50	29	21	114:149	5.3
12.	Langnau Tigers	50	27	23	114:130	4.9

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Lausanne	50	28	22	145:159	6.1
2.	Ambri-Piotta	50	28	22	131:163	5.9
3.	Lugano	50	27	23	156:128	5.7
4.	Bern	50	24	26	159:107	5.3
5.	Davos	50	23	27	131:150	5.6
6.	Zug	50	23	27	143:120	5.3
7.	Servette	50	22	28	124:146	5.4
8.	Zurich	50	22	28	138:127	5.3
9.	EHC Kloten	50	21	29	114:149	5.3
10.	Fribourg	50	21	29	128:132	5.2
11.	Biel	50	20	30	145:117	5.2
12.	Langnau Tigers	50	17	33	114:130	4.9

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Lausanne	50	21	29	145:159	6.1
2.	Ambri-Piotta	50	17	33	131:163	5.9
3.	Davos	50	17	33	131:150	5.6
4.	Lugano	50	16	34	156:128	5.7
5.	Bern	50	16	34	159:107	5.3
6.	Servette	50	13	37	124:146	5.4
7.	Zug	50	13	37	143:120	5.3
8.	Fribourg	50	13	37	128:132	5.2
9.	EHC Kloten	50	12	38	114:149	5.3
10.	Zurich	50	12	38	138:127	5.3
11.	Biel	50	12	38	145:117	5.2
12.	Langnau Tigers	50	10	40	114:130	4.9

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Lausanne	50	15	35	145:159	6.1
2.	Ambri-Piotta	50	13	37	131:163	5.9
3.	EHC Kloten	50	11	39	114:149	5.3
4.	Bern	50	10	40	159:107	5.3
5.	Davos	50	9	41	131:150	5.6
6.	Zug	50	9	41	143:120	5.3
7.	Fribourg	50	9	41	128:132	5.2
8.	Lugano	50	8	42	156:128	5.7
9.	Servette	50	8	42	124:146	5.4
10.	Langnau Tigers	50	8	42	114:130	4.9
11.	Biel	50	7	43	145:117	5.2
12.	Zurich	50	5	45	138:127	5.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Lausanne	50	9	41	145:159	6.1
2.	Ambri-Piotta	50	8	42	131:163	5.9
3.	Davos	50	6	44	131:150	5.6
4.	Lugano	50	5	45	156:128	5.7
5.	Zug	50	5	45	143:120	5.3
6.	Bern	50	5	45	159:107	5.3
7.	Fribourg	50	5	45	128:132	5.2
8.	Servette	50	4	46	124:146	5.4
9.	EHC Kloten	50	4	46	114:149	5.3
10.	Biel	50	3	47	145:117	5.2
11.	Zurich	50	2	48	138:127	5.3
12.	Langnau Tigers	50	2	48	114:130	4.9