#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Selber	16	16	0	90:50	8.8
2.	Deggendorf	16	16	0	72:43	7.2
3.	Weiden	16	16	0	63:50	7.1
4.	Peiting	16	16	0	62:51	7.1
5.	Lindau	16	16	0	43:63	6.6
6.	Regensburg	16	16	0	67:35	6.4
7.	Sonthofen	16	16	0	51:50	6.3
8.	Schonheide	16	16	0	32:65	6.1
9.	Hochstadt	16	16	0	46:52	6.1
10.	Tolzer Lowen	16	16	0	69:26	5.9
11.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	16	0	31:59	5.6
12.	Landshut	16	16	0	47:34	5.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Selber	16	16	0	90:50	8.8
2.	Deggendorf	16	16	0	72:43	7.2
3.	Weiden	16	16	0	63:50	7.1
4.	Lindau	16	16	0	43:63	6.6
5.	Regensburg	16	16	0	67:35	6.4
6.	Sonthofen	16	16	0	51:50	6.3
7.	Schonheide	16	16	0	32:65	6.1
8.	Tolzer Lowen	16	16	0	69:26	5.9
9.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	16	0	31:59	5.6
10.	Landshut	16	16	0	47:34	5.1
11.	Peiting	16	15	1	62:51	7.1
12.	Hochstadt	16	15	1	46:52	6.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Selber	16	16	0	90:50	8.8
2.	Weiden	16	16	0	63:50	7.1
3.	Lindau	16	16	0	43:63	6.6
4.	Regensburg	16	16	0	67:35	6.4
5.	Schonheide	16	16	0	32:65	6.1
6.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	16	0	31:59	5.6
7.	Deggendorf	16	15	1	72:43	7.2
8.	Hochstadt	16	15	1	46:52	6.1
9.	Tolzer Lowen	16	15	1	69:26	5.9
10.	Landshut	16	15	1	47:34	5.1
11.	Peiting	16	14	2	62:51	7.1
12.	Sonthofen	16	13	3	51:50	6.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Weiden	16	16	0	63:50	7.1
2.	Regensburg	16	16	0	67:35	6.4
3.	Selber	16	15	1	90:50	8.8
4.	Deggendorf	16	15	1	72:43	7.2
5.	Lindau	16	15	1	43:63	6.6
6.	Peiting	16	14	2	62:51	7.1
7.	Tolzer Lowen	16	14	2	69:26	5.9
8.	Schonheide	16	13	3	32:65	6.1
9.	Hochstadt	16	13	3	46:52	6.1
10.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	13	3	31:59	5.6
11.	Sonthofen	16	12	4	51:50	6.3
12.	Landshut	16	10	6	47:34	5.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Selber	16	15	1	90:50	8.8
2.	Deggendorf	16	14	2	72:43	7.2
3.	Peiting	16	14	2	62:51	7.1
4.	Regensburg	16	14	2	67:35	6.4
5.	Weiden	16	13	3	63:50	7.1
6.	Lindau	16	13	3	43:63	6.6
7.	Tolzer Lowen	16	13	3	69:26	5.9
8.	Sonthofen	16	11	5	51:50	6.3
9.	Schonheide	16	11	5	32:65	6.1
10.	Hochstadt	16	9	7	46:52	6.1
11.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	9	7	31:59	5.6
12.	Landshut	16	7	9	47:34	5.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Selber	16	15	1	90:50	8.8
2.	Deggendorf	16	12	4	72:43	7.2
3.	Regensburg	16	12	4	67:35	6.4
4.	Weiden	16	11	5	63:50	7.1
5.	Peiting	16	11	5	62:51	7.1
6.	Schonheide	16	10	6	32:65	6.1
7.	Lindau	16	9	7	43:63	6.6
8.	Hochstadt	16	9	7	46:52	6.1
9.	Tolzer Lowen	16	9	7	69:26	5.9
10.	Sonthofen	16	8	8	51:50	6.3
11.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	7	9	31:59	5.6
12.	Landshut	16	6	10	47:34	5.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Selber	16	13	3	90:50	8.8
2.	Deggendorf	16	10	6	72:43	7.2
3.	Weiden	16	10	6	63:50	7.1
4.	Regensburg	16	9	7	67:35	6.4
5.	Peiting	16	8	8	62:51	7.1
6.	Lindau	16	8	8	43:63	6.6
7.	Hochstadt	16	8	8	46:52	6.1
8.	Sonthofen	16	6	10	51:50	6.3
9.	Schonheide	16	6	10	32:65	6.1
10.	Tolzer Lowen	16	6	10	69:26	5.9
11.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	6	10	31:59	5.6
12.	Landshut	16	5	11	47:34	5.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Selber	16	10	6	90:50	8.8
2.	Deggendorf	16	7	9	72:43	7.2
3.	Weiden	16	7	9	63:50	7.1
4.	Peiting	16	6	10	62:51	7.1
5.	Hochstadt	16	6	10	46:52	6.1
6.	Lindau	16	5	11	43:63	6.6
7.	Sonthofen	16	5	11	51:50	6.3
8.	Schonheide	16	5	11	32:65	6.1
9.	Tolzer Lowen	16	4	12	69:26	5.9
10.	Regensburg	16	3	13	67:35	6.4
11.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	3	13	31:59	5.6
12.	Landshut	16	3	13	47:34	5.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Selber	16	9	7	90:50	8.8
2.	Deggendorf	16	4	12	72:43	7.2
3.	Peiting	16	4	12	62:51	7.1
4.	Lindau	16	4	12	43:63	6.6
5.	Sonthofen	16	4	12	51:50	6.3
6.	Hochstadt	16	4	12	46:52	6.1
7.	Weiden	16	2	14	63:50	7.1
8.	Tolzer Lowen	16	2	14	69:26	5.9
9.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	2	14	31:59	5.6
10.	Schonheide	16	1	15	32:65	6.1
11.	Landshut	16	1	15	47:34	5.1
12.	Regensburg	16	0	16	67:35	6.4