#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Peiting	16	16	0	84:49	8.3
2.	Lindau	16	16	0	65:58	7.7
3.	Weiden	16	16	0	55:66	7.6
4.	Deggendorf	16	16	0	75:46	7.6
5.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	16	0	41:77	7.4
6.	Landshut	16	16	0	79:37	7.3
7.	Starbulls Rosenheim	16	16	0	82:33	7.2
8.	Miesbach	16	16	0	33:80	7.1
9.	Regensburg	16	16	0	62:52	7.1
10.	Memmingen	16	16	0	43:67	6.9
11.	Selber	16	16	0	70:37	6.7
12.	Sonthofen	16	16	0	62:38	6.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Peiting	16	16	0	84:49	8.3
2.	Lindau	16	16	0	65:58	7.7
3.	Weiden	16	16	0	55:66	7.6
4.	Deggendorf	16	16	0	75:46	7.6
5.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	16	0	41:77	7.4
6.	Landshut	16	16	0	79:37	7.3
7.	Starbulls Rosenheim	16	16	0	82:33	7.2
8.	Miesbach	16	16	0	33:80	7.1
9.	Regensburg	16	16	0	62:52	7.1
10.	Memmingen	16	16	0	43:67	6.9
11.	Selber	16	16	0	70:37	6.7
12.	Sonthofen	16	16	0	62:38	6.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Peiting	16	16	0	84:49	8.3
2.	Weiden	16	16	0	55:66	7.6
3.	Deggendorf	16	16	0	75:46	7.6
4.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	16	0	41:77	7.4
5.	Landshut	16	16	0	79:37	7.3
6.	Starbulls Rosenheim	16	16	0	82:33	7.2
7.	Regensburg	16	16	0	62:52	7.1
8.	Sonthofen	16	16	0	62:38	6.3
9.	Lindau	16	15	1	65:58	7.7
10.	Miesbach	16	15	1	33:80	7.1
11.	Memmingen	16	15	1	43:67	6.9
12.	Selber	16	14	2	70:37	6.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Weiden	16	16	0	55:66	7.6
2.	Deggendorf	16	16	0	75:46	7.6
3.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	16	0	41:77	7.4
4.	Starbulls Rosenheim	16	16	0	82:33	7.2
5.	Regensburg	16	16	0	62:52	7.1
6.	Sonthofen	16	16	0	62:38	6.3
7.	Peiting	16	15	1	84:49	8.3
8.	Lindau	16	15	1	65:58	7.7
9.	Landshut	16	15	1	79:37	7.3
10.	Memmingen	16	15	1	43:67	6.9
11.	Selber	16	14	2	70:37	6.7
12.	Miesbach	16	13	3	33:80	7.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Deggendorf	16	16	0	75:46	7.6
2.	Peiting	16	15	1	84:49	8.3
3.	Weiden	16	15	1	55:66	7.6
4.	Regensburg	16	15	1	62:52	7.1
5.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	14	2	41:77	7.4
6.	Landshut	16	14	2	79:37	7.3
7.	Memmingen	16	14	2	43:67	6.9
8.	Starbulls Rosenheim	16	13	3	82:33	7.2
9.	Miesbach	16	13	3	33:80	7.1
10.	Selber	16	13	3	70:37	6.7
11.	Sonthofen	16	13	3	62:38	6.3
12.	Lindau	16	11	5	65:58	7.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Deggendorf	16	15	1	75:46	7.6
2.	Peiting	16	14	2	84:49	8.3
3.	Weiden	16	13	3	55:66	7.6
4.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	13	3	41:77	7.4
5.	Landshut	16	12	4	79:37	7.3
6.	Regensburg	16	12	4	62:52	7.1
7.	Memmingen	16	12	4	43:67	6.9
8.	Miesbach	16	11	5	33:80	7.1
9.	Lindau	16	10	6	65:58	7.7
10.	Starbulls Rosenheim	16	10	6	82:33	7.2
11.	Sonthofen	16	10	6	62:38	6.3
12.	Selber	16	9	7	70:37	6.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Peiting	16	14	2	84:49	8.3
2.	Deggendorf	16	11	5	75:46	7.6
3.	Landshut	16	11	5	79:37	7.3
4.	Miesbach	16	10	6	33:80	7.1
5.	Memmingen	16	10	6	43:67	6.9
6.	Lindau	16	9	7	65:58	7.7
7.	Weiden	16	9	7	55:66	7.6
8.	Starbulls Rosenheim	16	8	8	82:33	7.2
9.	Selber	16	8	8	70:37	6.7
10.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	7	9	41:77	7.4
11.	Regensburg	16	7	9	62:52	7.1
12.	Sonthofen	16	7	9	62:38	6.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Peiting	16	13	3	84:49	8.3
2.	Miesbach	16	9	7	33:80	7.1
3.	Lindau	16	7	9	65:58	7.7
4.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	7	9	41:77	7.4
5.	Landshut	16	7	9	79:37	7.3
6.	Weiden	16	6	10	55:66	7.6
7.	Deggendorf	16	6	10	75:46	7.6
8.	Starbulls Rosenheim	16	6	10	82:33	7.2
9.	Memmingen	16	6	10	43:67	6.9
10.	Selber	16	6	10	70:37	6.7
11.	Regensburg	16	5	11	62:52	7.1
12.	Sonthofen	16	4	12	62:38	6.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Peiting	16	8	8	84:49	8.3
2.	Selber	16	6	10	70:37	6.7
3.	Lindau	16	5	11	65:58	7.7
4.	Starbulls Rosenheim	16	5	11	82:33	7.2
5.	Memmingen	16	5	11	43:67	6.9
6.	Weiden	16	4	12	55:66	7.6
7.	Deggendorf	16	4	12	75:46	7.6
8.	EHC Waldkraiburg	16	4	12	41:77	7.4
9.	Landshut	16	4	12	79:37	7.3
10.	Miesbach	16	4	12	33:80	7.1
11.	Regensburg	16	4	12	62:52	7.1
12.	Sonthofen	16	1	15	62:38	6.3