#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Weiden	22	22	0	60:113	7.9
2.	Erding	22	22	0	68:104	7.8
3.	Sonthofen	22	22	0	60:110	7.7
4.	Fussen	22	22	0	59:102	7.3
5.	Regensburg	22	22	0	74:84	7.2
6.	Tolzer Lowen	22	22	0	66:85	6.9
7.	Bayreuth	22	22	0	76:75	6.9
8.	Selber	22	22	0	88:63	6.9
9.	Freiburg	22	22	0	82:65	6.7
10.	Deggendorf	22	22	0	52:85	6.2
11.	Peiting	22	22	0	61:72	6
12.	Klostersee	22	22	0	62:64	5.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Weiden	22	22	0	60:113	7.9
2.	Erding	22	22	0	68:104	7.8
3.	Sonthofen	22	22	0	60:110	7.7
4.	Fussen	22	22	0	59:102	7.3
5.	Tolzer Lowen	22	22	0	66:85	6.9
6.	Bayreuth	22	22	0	76:75	6.9
7.	Selber	22	22	0	88:63	6.9
8.	Freiburg	22	22	0	82:65	6.7
9.	Deggendorf	22	22	0	52:85	6.2
10.	Peiting	22	22	0	61:72	6
11.	Klostersee	22	22	0	62:64	5.7
12.	Regensburg	22	21	1	74:84	7.2

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	22	22	0	60:110	7.7
2.	Deggendorf	22	22	0	52:85	6.2
3.	Klostersee	22	22	0	62:64	5.7
4.	Weiden	22	21	1	60:113	7.9
5.	Erding	22	21	1	68:104	7.8
6.	Fussen	22	21	1	59:102	7.3
7.	Regensburg	22	21	1	74:84	7.2
8.	Bayreuth	22	21	1	76:75	6.9
9.	Selber	22	21	1	88:63	6.9
10.	Peiting	22	21	1	61:72	6
11.	Tolzer Lowen	22	20	2	66:85	6.9
12.	Freiburg	22	20	2	82:65	6.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Weiden	22	21	1	60:113	7.9
2.	Erding	22	21	1	68:104	7.8
3.	Regensburg	22	21	1	74:84	7.2
4.	Selber	22	21	1	88:63	6.9
5.	Deggendorf	22	21	1	52:85	6.2
6.	Sonthofen	22	20	2	60:110	7.7
7.	Fussen	22	20	2	59:102	7.3
8.	Tolzer Lowen	22	20	2	66:85	6.9
9.	Freiburg	22	20	2	82:65	6.7
10.	Peiting	22	20	2	61:72	6
11.	Bayreuth	22	19	3	76:75	6.9
12.	Klostersee	22	19	3	62:64	5.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Regensburg	22	20	2	74:84	7.2
2.	Tolzer Lowen	22	20	2	66:85	6.9
3.	Weiden	22	19	3	60:113	7.9
4.	Erding	22	19	3	68:104	7.8
5.	Selber	22	19	3	88:63	6.9
6.	Sonthofen	22	18	4	60:110	7.7
7.	Fussen	22	18	4	59:102	7.3
8.	Bayreuth	22	18	4	76:75	6.9
9.	Freiburg	22	17	5	82:65	6.7
10.	Peiting	22	17	5	61:72	6
11.	Deggendorf	22	16	6	52:85	6.2
12.	Klostersee	22	15	7	62:64	5.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Erding	22	19	3	68:104	7.8
2.	Weiden	22	18	4	60:113	7.9
3.	Sonthofen	22	18	4	60:110	7.7
4.	Regensburg	22	18	4	74:84	7.2
5.	Tolzer Lowen	22	17	5	66:85	6.9
6.	Bayreuth	22	16	6	76:75	6.9
7.	Selber	22	16	6	88:63	6.9
8.	Fussen	22	14	8	59:102	7.3
9.	Freiburg	22	13	9	82:65	6.7
10.	Deggendorf	22	13	9	52:85	6.2
11.	Peiting	22	11	11	61:72	6
12.	Klostersee	22	10	12	62:64	5.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Erding	22	17	5	68:104	7.8
2.	Weiden	22	15	7	60:113	7.9
3.	Sonthofen	22	14	8	60:110	7.7
4.	Bayreuth	22	14	8	76:75	6.9
5.	Regensburg	22	12	10	74:84	7.2
6.	Tolzer Lowen	22	12	10	66:85	6.9
7.	Fussen	22	11	11	59:102	7.3
8.	Selber	22	11	11	88:63	6.9
9.	Deggendorf	22	11	11	52:85	6.2
10.	Freiburg	22	10	12	82:65	6.7
11.	Klostersee	22	8	14	62:64	5.7
12.	Peiting	22	6	16	61:72	6

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Erding	22	16	6	68:104	7.8
2.	Weiden	22	12	10	60:113	7.9
3.	Sonthofen	22	11	11	60:110	7.7
4.	Freiburg	22	10	12	82:65	6.7
5.	Fussen	22	9	13	59:102	7.3
6.	Regensburg	22	9	13	74:84	7.2
7.	Selber	22	8	14	88:63	6.9
8.	Tolzer Lowen	22	7	15	66:85	6.9
9.	Bayreuth	22	6	16	76:75	6.9
10.	Klostersee	22	6	16	62:64	5.7
11.	Deggendorf	22	5	17	52:85	6.2
12.	Peiting	22	5	17	61:72	6

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Erding	22	11	11	68:104	7.8
2.	Weiden	22	8	14	60:113	7.9
3.	Sonthofen	22	8	14	60:110	7.7
4.	Fussen	22	7	15	59:102	7.3
5.	Regensburg	22	7	15	74:84	7.2
6.	Selber	22	6	16	88:63	6.9
7.	Freiburg	22	6	16	82:65	6.7
8.	Tolzer Lowen	22	4	18	66:85	6.9
9.	Bayreuth	22	4	18	76:75	6.9
10.	Deggendorf	22	3	19	52:85	6.2
11.	Peiting	22	3	19	61:72	6
12.	Klostersee	22	1	21	62:64	5.7