#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Regensburg	44	44	0	200:145	7.8
2.	Erding	44	44	0	143:193	7.6
3.	Bayreuth	44	44	0	190:125	7.2
4.	Sonthofen	44	44	0	133:184	7.2
5.	Tolzer Lowen	44	44	0	156:158	7.1
6.	Fussen	44	44	0	121:191	7.1
7.	Weiden	44	44	0	107:198	6.9
8.	Selber	44	44	0	182:116	6.8
9.	Freiburg	44	44	0	194:99	6.7
10.	Peiting	44	44	0	143:146	6.6
11.	Deggendorf	44	44	0	118:150	6.1
12.	Klostersee	44	44	0	143:125	6.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Erding	44	44	0	143:193	7.6
2.	Bayreuth	44	44	0	190:125	7.2
3.	Sonthofen	44	44	0	133:184	7.2
4.	Tolzer Lowen	44	44	0	156:158	7.1
5.	Fussen	44	44	0	121:191	7.1
6.	Weiden	44	44	0	107:198	6.9
7.	Freiburg	44	44	0	194:99	6.7
8.	Peiting	44	44	0	143:146	6.6
9.	Deggendorf	44	44	0	118:150	6.1
10.	Klostersee	44	44	0	143:125	6.1
11.	Regensburg	44	43	1	200:145	7.8
12.	Selber	44	43	1	182:116	6.8

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	44	44	0	133:184	7.2
2.	Regensburg	44	43	1	200:145	7.8
3.	Fussen	44	43	1	121:191	7.1
4.	Deggendorf	44	43	1	118:150	6.1
5.	Bayreuth	44	42	2	190:125	7.2
6.	Tolzer Lowen	44	42	2	156:158	7.1
7.	Weiden	44	42	2	107:198	6.9
8.	Peiting	44	42	2	143:146	6.6
9.	Klostersee	44	42	2	143:125	6.1
10.	Erding	44	41	3	143:193	7.6
11.	Selber	44	41	3	182:116	6.8
12.	Freiburg	44	41	3	194:99	6.7

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Regensburg	44	43	1	200:145	7.8
2.	Tolzer Lowen	44	42	2	156:158	7.1
3.	Sonthofen	44	41	3	133:184	7.2
4.	Fussen	44	41	3	121:191	7.1
5.	Selber	44	41	3	182:116	6.8
6.	Peiting	44	41	3	143:146	6.6
7.	Deggendorf	44	41	3	118:150	6.1
8.	Erding	44	40	4	143:193	7.6
9.	Bayreuth	44	40	4	190:125	7.2
10.	Weiden	44	40	4	107:198	6.9
11.	Freiburg	44	39	5	194:99	6.7
12.	Klostersee	44	37	7	143:125	6.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Regensburg	44	40	4	200:145	7.8
2.	Tolzer Lowen	44	39	5	156:158	7.1
3.	Erding	44	37	7	143:193	7.6
4.	Bayreuth	44	37	7	190:125	7.2
5.	Weiden	44	37	7	107:198	6.9
6.	Selber	44	36	8	182:116	6.8
7.	Peiting	44	36	8	143:146	6.6
8.	Sonthofen	44	35	9	133:184	7.2
9.	Fussen	44	35	9	121:191	7.1
10.	Deggendorf	44	35	9	118:150	6.1
11.	Freiburg	44	34	10	194:99	6.7
12.	Klostersee	44	31	13	143:125	6.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Regensburg	44	36	8	200:145	7.8
2.	Erding	44	34	10	143:193	7.6
3.	Bayreuth	44	33	11	190:125	7.2
4.	Sonthofen	44	33	11	133:184	7.2
5.	Tolzer Lowen	44	31	13	156:158	7.1
6.	Weiden	44	31	13	107:198	6.9
7.	Selber	44	31	13	182:116	6.8
8.	Fussen	44	30	14	121:191	7.1
9.	Peiting	44	29	15	143:146	6.6
10.	Freiburg	44	28	16	194:99	6.7
11.	Deggendorf	44	27	17	118:150	6.1
12.	Klostersee	44	23	21	143:125	6.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Erding	44	29	15	143:193	7.6
2.	Regensburg	44	28	16	200:145	7.8
3.	Bayreuth	44	27	17	190:125	7.2
4.	Sonthofen	44	25	19	133:184	7.2
5.	Tolzer Lowen	44	25	19	156:158	7.1
6.	Fussen	44	23	21	121:191	7.1
7.	Selber	44	23	21	182:116	6.8
8.	Freiburg	44	22	22	194:99	6.7
9.	Weiden	44	21	23	107:198	6.9
10.	Peiting	44	21	23	143:146	6.6
11.	Deggendorf	44	19	25	118:150	6.1
12.	Klostersee	44	19	25	143:125	6.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Erding	44	27	17	143:193	7.6
2.	Regensburg	44	23	21	200:145	7.8
3.	Sonthofen	44	19	25	133:184	7.2
4.	Freiburg	44	19	25	194:99	6.7
5.	Tolzer Lowen	44	17	27	156:158	7.1
6.	Weiden	44	17	27	107:198	6.9
7.	Selber	44	17	27	182:116	6.8
8.	Bayreuth	44	16	28	190:125	7.2
9.	Fussen	44	15	29	121:191	7.1
10.	Peiting	44	15	29	143:146	6.6
11.	Klostersee	44	15	29	143:125	6.1
12.	Deggendorf	44	8	36	118:150	6.1

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Erding	44	20	24	143:193	7.6
2.	Regensburg	44	17	27	200:145	7.8
3.	Sonthofen	44	13	31	133:184	7.2
4.	Bayreuth	44	11	33	190:125	7.2
5.	Tolzer Lowen	44	11	33	156:158	7.1
6.	Fussen	44	11	33	121:191	7.1
7.	Selber	44	11	33	182:116	6.8
8.	Freiburg	44	11	33	194:99	6.7
9.	Weiden	44	10	34	107:198	6.9
10.	Peiting	44	8	36	143:146	6.6
11.	Klostersee	44	8	36	143:125	6.1
12.	Deggendorf	44	5	39	118:150	6.1