#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	40	40	0	136:182	8
2.	Regensburg	40	40	0	200:94	7.4
3.	Weiden	40	40	0	128:155	7.1
4.	Klostersee	40	40	0	118:166	7.1
5.	Selber	40	40	0	143:136	7
6.	Deggendorf	40	40	0	135:139	6.9
7.	Schonheide	40	40	0	93:177	6.8
8.	Bayreuth	40	40	0	152:113	6.6
9.	Landshut	40	40	0	145:112	6.4
10.	Peiting	40	40	0	134:119	6.3
11.	Tolzer Lowen	40	40	0	117:108	5.6

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	40	40	0	136:182	8
2.	Regensburg	40	40	0	200:94	7.4
3.	Weiden	40	40	0	128:155	7.1
4.	Klostersee	40	40	0	118:166	7.1
5.	Selber	40	40	0	143:136	7
6.	Deggendorf	40	40	0	135:139	6.9
7.	Schonheide	40	40	0	93:177	6.8
8.	Landshut	40	40	0	145:112	6.4
9.	Bayreuth	40	39	1	152:113	6.6
10.	Peiting	40	39	1	134:119	6.3
11.	Tolzer Lowen	40	38	2	117:108	5.6

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	40	40	0	136:182	8
2.	Schonheide	40	40	0	93:177	6.8
3.	Selber	40	39	1	143:136	7
4.	Deggendorf	40	39	1	135:139	6.9
5.	Bayreuth	40	39	1	152:113	6.6
6.	Weiden	40	38	2	128:155	7.1
7.	Klostersee	40	38	2	118:166	7.1
8.	Regensburg	40	37	3	200:94	7.4
9.	Landshut	40	37	3	145:112	6.4
10.	Peiting	40	37	3	134:119	6.3
11.	Tolzer Lowen	40	34	6	117:108	5.6

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	40	40	0	136:182	8
2.	Schonheide	40	38	2	93:177	6.8
3.	Weiden	40	37	3	128:155	7.1
4.	Klostersee	40	37	3	118:166	7.1
5.	Regensburg	40	36	4	200:94	7.4
6.	Selber	40	36	4	143:136	7
7.	Deggendorf	40	36	4	135:139	6.9
8.	Bayreuth	40	36	4	152:113	6.6
9.	Landshut	40	34	6	145:112	6.4
10.	Peiting	40	34	6	134:119	6.3
11.	Tolzer Lowen	40	32	8	117:108	5.6

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	40	38	2	136:182	8
2.	Klostersee	40	35	5	118:166	7.1
3.	Selber	40	34	6	143:136	7
4.	Regensburg	40	32	8	200:94	7.4
5.	Weiden	40	32	8	128:155	7.1
6.	Schonheide	40	32	8	93:177	6.8
7.	Deggendorf	40	31	9	135:139	6.9
8.	Bayreuth	40	31	9	152:113	6.6
9.	Peiting	40	29	11	134:119	6.3
10.	Landshut	40	27	13	145:112	6.4
11.	Tolzer Lowen	40	27	13	117:108	5.6

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	40	35	5	136:182	8
2.	Regensburg	40	30	10	200:94	7.4
3.	Weiden	40	29	11	128:155	7.1
4.	Klostersee	40	28	12	118:166	7.1
5.	Selber	40	28	12	143:136	7
6.	Bayreuth	40	27	13	152:113	6.6
7.	Schonheide	40	26	14	93:177	6.8
8.	Landshut	40	26	14	145:112	6.4
9.	Tolzer Lowen	40	25	15	117:108	5.6
10.	Deggendorf	40	24	16	135:139	6.9
11.	Peiting	40	24	16	134:119	6.3

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	40	27	13	136:182	8
2.	Regensburg	40	25	15	200:94	7.4
3.	Klostersee	40	24	16	118:166	7.1
4.	Weiden	40	23	17	128:155	7.1
5.	Bayreuth	40	21	19	152:113	6.6
6.	Selber	40	20	20	143:136	7
7.	Deggendorf	40	20	20	135:139	6.9
8.	Schonheide	40	20	20	93:177	6.8
9.	Landshut	40	19	21	145:112	6.4
10.	Peiting	40	19	21	134:119	6.3
11.	Tolzer Lowen	40	14	26	117:108	5.6

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	40	20	20	136:182	8
2.	Regensburg	40	20	20	200:94	7.4
3.	Deggendorf	40	19	21	135:139	6.9
4.	Weiden	40	18	22	128:155	7.1
5.	Klostersee	40	18	22	118:166	7.1
6.	Selber	40	17	23	143:136	7
7.	Bayreuth	40	16	24	152:113	6.6
8.	Schonheide	40	13	27	93:177	6.8
9.	Peiting	40	13	27	134:119	6.3
10.	Landshut	40	12	28	145:112	6.4
11.	Tolzer Lowen	40	10	30	117:108	5.6

#	Team	MP	Over	Under	G	G/M	Last 5
1.	Sonthofen	40	15	25	136:182	8
2.	Regensburg	40	13	27	200:94	7.4
3.	Weiden	40	12	28	128:155	7.1
4.	Selber	40	11	29	143:136	7
5.	Deggendorf	40	11	29	135:139	6.9
6.	Schonheide	40	10	30	93:177	6.8
7.	Klostersee	40	8	32	118:166	7.1
8.	Bayreuth	40	8	32	152:113	6.6
9.	Landshut	40	6	34	145:112	6.4
10.	Peiting	40	6	34	134:119	6.3
11.	Tolzer Lowen	40	4	36	117:108	5.6